<\/p>\n
The exhibition on the Bicentennial anniversary of the Latin American Independence wants to propose a more complete scenario that goes beyond both the official view of the facts, and the common belief that the Latin American Independence was a fruit of the French Revolution. The official view insisted on the aspect of modernity of America, characterized from the beginning by the pursuit of independence. The clich\u00e9 regarding the Latin American Independence emphatically states that such independence would take place under the pressure of the ideals of \u201cliberty, equality, and fraternity.\u201d
\nThe exhibition will try to look at the phenomenon of independence starting from the attempt of people who — moved by the desire of their heart \u2013- longed for something new capable to change the world, even though they collided with the limit and the disproportion that reality imposed on them. The exhibition will start describing the constitution of a new Latin American subject after the Discovery (at the end of the 15th century) and will end with questions regarding the current situation, with an emphasis on the process that led to the Latin American Independence.
\nThe first section describes the great cultural and political unity of the Kingdoms of the Indies, which started with the Discovery of America (1492) and dramatically took shape starting from that event. After three centuries, a great crisis hit the Spanish Monarchy following Napoleon\u2019s invasion (1808) into the Iberian Peninsula; because of this circumstance various Latin American movements seeking independence were born. The independence wasn\u2019t born in America, but rather it was a consequence of that crisis. What moved people apparently so different, such as Agust\u00edn de Iturbide, Jos\u00e9 San Mart\u00edn, or Sim\u00f3n Bol\u00edvar? The whole 19th century witnessed the dramatic change from the ancient concept of \u201cIndian nation\u201d to the concept of \u201cmodern nation.\u201d
\nHow could such traditional peoples as the Spanish and the American ones suddenly establish such modern political regimes? Or moreover, why didn\u2019t the process for independence lead to a total separation from Spain, but rather was prolonged through the painful internal separation of the former provinces that formed the vice reigns? And again, why did this historical fact bring to the establishment of a Caudillism that made any attempt at unity impossible, and instead paved the way to a crisis that is still real today? This history and these questions form the second section.
\nThe people that were seeking a change in society through the revolution had to fight within these tensions. Today, when celebrating the Bicentennial anniversary, which should be the right attitude that can support us in keeping desiring what our Founding Fathers desired? Which kind of politics truly serve that desire? \u201cGive up the laws and, then, what distinguishes the state from a bunch of bandits?\u201d (St. Augustine). Who supports the education of man\u2019s desire in history? The third and last section of the exhibition will try to answer to these questions.<\/p>\n
By Anibal Fornari, Luis Ferrero, Juli\u00e1n De la Morena, Dolores Ruiz de Galarreta, Mar\u00eda Itat\u00ed Cabral, Luc\u00eda Ferrero, Alver Metalli, Graciela Tayara.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The exhibition on the Bicentennial anniversary of the Latin American Independence wants to propose a more complete scenario that goes beyond both the official view of the facts, and … <\/p>\n